Tidbits From The Wall Street Journal
16 May 2016
An Ill Wind: Open Season on Bald Eagles
Sacrificing 4,200 of the birds a year for green energy sounds fine to regulators.
By Robert Bryce | 513 words
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the agency charged with protecting bald and golden eagles, is once again trying to make it easier for the wind industry to kill those birds.
Two weeks ago the agency opened public comment on “proposed improvements”to its eagle conservation program. It wants to extend the length of permits for accidental eagle kills from the current five years to 30 years.
The changes would allow wind-energy producers to kill or injure as many as 4,200 bald eagles every year. That’s a lot.
The agency estimates there are now about 72,434 bald eagles in the continental U.S.
Let’s hope Judge Lucy H. Koh is keeping an eye out. Last August, Ms. Koh, a federal judge in California, shot down the Fish and Wildlife Service’s previous “improvements.”
In a lawsuit brought by the American Bird Conservancy, Judge Koh ruled that the agency had violated the National Environmental Policy Act by declaring that it could issue 30-year permits without first doing an environmental assessment. Now the agency has drafted an environmental review and is still pushing for the 30-year permits.
Yet as Judge Koh noted in her ruling, one of the agency’s own eagle program managers warned that 30-year permits are “inherently less protective”and “real, significant, and cumulative biological impacts will result.”
A 2013 study in the Wildlife Society Bulletin estimated that wind turbines killed about 888,000 bats and 573,000 birds (including 83,000 raptors) in 2012 alone.
But wind capacity has since increased by about 24%, and it could triple by 2030 under the White House’s Clean Power Plan.
“We don’t really know how many birds are being killed now by wind turbines because the wind industry doesn’t have to report the data,”says Michael Hutchins of the American Bird Conservancy.
“It’s considered a trade secret.”
The new rule could further harm golden eagles, which are rarer than bald eagles and are being whacked by wind turbines in far greater numbers.
Mr. Hutchins says that the lack of protection for golden eagles is “the biggest weakness of this whole rule.”The double standard is stunning.
In 2011 the Fish and Wildlife Service convinced the Justice Department to file criminal indictments against three oil companies working in North Dakota’s Bakken field for inadvertently killing six ducks and one phoebe.
Now see how the agency treats wind: In 2013 it submitted to the Federal Register that “wind developers have informed the [Department of the Interior] and the Service that 5-year permits have inhibited their ability to obtain financing, and we changed the regulations to accommodate that need.
”Nine months after being rebuked by a federal judge, America’s top wildlife protector is still bending over backward to accommodate an industry that is killing iconic wildlife while at the same time collecting huge subsidies from taxpayers.
If there’s a better example of regulatory capture and crony capitalism, I can’t think of one.
Mr. Bryce is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. His latest book is “Smaller Faster Lighter Denser Cheaper: How Innovation Keeps Proving the Catastrophists Wrong”(Public Affairs, 2014)